<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: about</title>
	<atom:link href="http://williamwolff.org/about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://williamwolff.org</link>
	<description>courses, research, and a blog about teaching, writing, learning, photography, and all things related</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:53:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Class Session 5 03/03/2010 &#171; Research In Progress</title>
		<link>http://williamwolff.org/about/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Class Session 5 03/03/2010 &#171; Research In Progress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 05:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamwolff.org/?page_id=1657#comment-311</guid>
		<description>[...] Professor Wolff highlighted the importance of the interview “opening up.”  The interviewer needs to take his or her time as to not “rush the interview.”  Background information on the subject will establish the context of research.  In methodically approaching the research preparation is key!  We (the students of Core II: Research Methods for Writers) are to recognize our preconceived notions/ opinions in respects to our research and “leave them at the door.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Professor Wolff highlighted the importance of the interview “opening up.”  The interviewer needs to take his or her time as to not “rush the interview.”  Background information on the subject will establish the context of research.  In methodically approaching the research preparation is key!  We (the students of Core II: Research Methods for Writers) are to recognize our preconceived notions/ opinions in respects to our research and “leave them at the door.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Class Session 4 02/17/2010 &#171; Research In Progress</title>
		<link>http://williamwolff.org/about/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Class Session 4 02/17/2010 &#171; Research In Progress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamwolff.org/?page_id=1657#comment-310</guid>
		<description>[...] Professor Wolff handed out several books.  We were then to decide if the books would be considered scholarly sources in our research.  The deciding factors of whether or not a book is to be considered scholarly: author, publishing house, editors, and the type of text. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Professor Wolff handed out several books.  We were then to decide if the books would be considered scholarly sources in our research.  The deciding factors of whether or not a book is to be considered scholarly: author, publishing house, editors, and the type of text. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

